France's National Assembly, the lower house of parliament, is debating legislation that would make it significantly easier to return tens of thousands of artworks and cultural artefacts looted during the country's colonial era. The bill, which specifically targets items acquired between 1815 and 1972, passed the upper house — the Senate — unanimously in January and now awaits approval from the lower chamber before it can become law.
France currently holds an enormous collection of objects taken from its former empire, and restitution demands have piled up from countries including Algeria, Mali and Benin. Under existing French law, every item held in the national collection must be approved for return through a separate parliamentary vote — a cumbersome process that has slowed restitution to a trickle. The proposed legislation is designed to streamline that procedure in one sweeping framework. In a notable recent case, parliament voted in early 2025 to return a ceremonial "talking drum" taken from the Ebrie tribe of present-day Ivory Coast by colonial troops in 1916; the drum was repatriated in March.
The bill reflects a broader commitment made by President Emmanuel Macron, who has gone further than any of his predecessors in publicly acknowledging past French abuses in Africa. Speaking in Ouagadougou, the capital of Burkina Faso, shortly after taking office in 2017, Macron pledged that France would cease interfering in its former colonies and promised to facilitate the return of African cultural heritage within five years. France is not alone in this effort — other former European colonial powers have been gradually repatriating objects obtained during imperial conquests — but its legal framework has made progress particularly slow.
The bill has nonetheless sparked political friction across the spectrum. The hard-left France Unbowed party argues the legislation does not go far enough and wants its scope broadened, while the far-right National Rally wants restitution limited to countries that maintain "cordial" relations with France — a provision that would effectively exclude several west African nations now governed by military juntas that have turned hostile to Paris following a wave of coups in recent years.
The debate reflects a wider reckoning in Europe over cultural heritage and the legacy of colonialism. For the source countries, the return of looted objects carries deep historical and symbolic significance. For France, the outcome of this vote will test whether political will can overcome both legal inertia and ideological division.